Most cloud cost tools are built for finance teams and have the security posture to match. TurboFinOps was built with a security audit in mind: row-level security on every tenant table, AES-256-GCM credential encryption with per-row key version, SAML SSO + SCIM, an immutable audit log, and an EU-hosted production environment by default.
Vendor cost tools ask for write keys on day 1
A read-only review is the entry point; write access is requested per approved fix, not granted up front.
No clear DPA, no subprocessor list, no trust center
You spend two weeks chasing the vendor for paperwork your legal team needs.
No tenant isolation evidence
You're told "we have multi-tenancy" but cannot see the controls or the tests.
Tenant isolation enforced at the DB layer
Postgres row-level security policies on every tenant-scoped table, plus a critical integration test suite and a quarterly drift audit script.
Encryption with rotation audit trail
AES-256-GCM + HKDF-derived keys + optional HSM (AWS KMS / Azure Key Vault / GCP KMS). Per-row keyVersion column lets you answer "which key encrypted this row?" with an indexed query.
Procurement-ready trust surface
Published DPA at /legal/dpa, subprocessor list at /subprocessors, security FAQ at /security, public roadmap at /roadmap, SOC 2 readiness mapped at docs/compliance/.
First four clicks once you sign up
Looking at this from a different role?
Connect one AWS, Azure or GCP scope, approve the safest savings actions, and give finance a receipt when the savings verify.
