Waste signals
- On-demand pricing with consistent monthly spend > $2k
- Tables not partitioned where date-based filters dominate
- Hot-tier storage on infrequently-queried datasets
BigQuery cost has two axes: storage and compute. TurboFinOps surfaces both — partition design, slot vs on-demand and long-term storage tiering.
Workflow
Inventory datasets, tables, query patterns and cost.
Findings show slot vs on-demand and partition candidates.
Reservation purchase passes finance approval.
Receipts confirm BigQuery spend drops.
FAQ
No — it requires predictable workload. TurboFinOps recommends only when 30-day usage is stable enough to justify.
High-cost query patterns are surfaced; rewrite is a manual change with a recommendation card.
Related gcp cost optimization guides
Connect a read-only scope. The first findings appear before any commercial conversation.
Connect one AWS, Azure or GCP scope, approve the safest savings actions, and give finance a receipt when the savings verify.